LOS ANGELES (AP) -- A jury on Friday rejected a defamation case
against Courtney Love over a Twitter post that suggested one of her
attorneys had been "bought off" for not pursuing a lawsuit over her late
The verdict came after roughly three hours of
deliberation in a case that spanned eight days and focused on the Hole
frontwoman's postings on the social networking site. The case centered
on one 2010 post that suggested that San Diego attorney Rhonda Holmes
had been "bought off" and that was why she wasn't representing the
Love had hired Holmes to file a fraud case against
the estate of her late husband, Nirvana frontman Kurt Cobain. The
lawyer contended during the trial that she was fired by Love and that
the tweet and other statements the singer made against her have caused
her substantial damage.
Love's tweet stated, "I was (expletive) devastated when Rhonda J
Holmes Esq of san diego was bought off" in response to a question from
user of the popular social media site.
The message was never meant
to be public, Love told jurors. She said she meant for it to be sent as
a direct message, which only the recipient would see, but it instead
went public and was quickly deleted.
The swift verdict wasn't
witnessed by Love, who had left court after closing arguments ended
Friday morning. She arrived just as the courthouse was closing down and
met her attorneys, John Lawrence and Matthew Bures, in the hallway where
she hugged them both.
Love praised her attorneys and the jury
after the verdict. Asked about her social media presence, Love said she
refrained from posting on Twitter during the trial. "I didn't tweet out
of respect for the case," she said.
While the case was billed as
the first "Twibel" trial in which Twitter and libel law intersected,
Lawrence said it was tried by the same rules as traditional defamation
Jurors determined that Love's tweet included false information, but the musician didn't know it wasn't true.
attorney Mitchell Langberg said the jury's verdict meant the panel
determined Love's statement was defamatory, but the singer couldn't be
held liable for it. Holmes' side asked the panel to award $8 million in
damages and send a message that false statements online had
Langberg said that while his client was disappointed with the
verdict, her reputation was upheld and the world now knows that Love's
statements were false.
"At the end of the day, her biggest asset in life is her reputation," Langberg said. "That she got back today."
Love's social media postings have gotten her into trouble several times.
2011, she agreed to pay $430,000 to fashion designer Dawn Simorangkir
over statements she posted on Twitter and Myspace. Simorangkir sued Love
again last year, alleging the musician libeled her when Love accused
Simorangkir of theft on the Howard Stern's radio show and taunted her on
the social media site Pinterest. The case is pending, but Love said
she's trying to be more careful about her online musings than she was
when she tweeted about Holmes.
"I don't tweet like I did back then," Love said Friday.